|Britain's Legal Power to Opt-Out of EU Economic and Political Integration|
The following unaccredited article was published in the 27 April 2007 issue of eurofacts and was reprinted with permission in the May 2007 issue of Sovereignty. eurofacts is an 8-12 page journal published fortnightly and available for £28 payable to eurofacts, PO Box 119, Totnes, Devon, TQ9 7WA. www.junepress.com
There is no legal impediment to British withdrawal from the EU or to seeking to achieve a looser relationship with Brussels.
Renegotiating EU Membership
Each renegotiation has radically altered the nature of the EU. There is no legal reason why future EU renegotiations should not provide some or all member-states with a looser relationship with "Brussels" and with each other than hitherto. Such difficulties that might be encountered are entirely of a political kind.
Flexibility is already built in to the existing EU treaties. Fewer than half (thirteen out of twenty-seven) of the current member-states have adopted its principal economic and political project, the "single" currency.
The EU has long-standing free trade arrangements with its near-neighbours in Europe: for example, Turkey (a member of the EU customs union), Switzerland, Iceland and Norway (not members of the EU customs union). Outside Europe, the EU has a free trade agreement with a NAFTA-member, Mexico, and, once current negotiations are completed, will have free trade agreements with approximately 90 other countries -- around half of all the countries in the world.
Thus, neither on the grounds of precedent, nor of EU or international law, is there any impediment to a country like the United Kingdom negotiating with the EU an arrangement which suits it best.
Leaving the EU altogether
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Lord Triesman): Parliament may amend or repeal any existing Act of Parliament, including the European Communities Act 1972. There is no formal procedure for withdrawal in the EU treaties, nor are there any provisions in the treaties or any other international obligations which affect the ultimate ability of the UK to withdraw from the EU.
This formal statement of the position is consistent with the understanding of the government of the day in 1975, when, in its referendum on continuing UK membership of the EU, withdrawal would have ensued had the result gone the other way.
Greenland, then a province of Denmark, withdrew from the EU in 1985. The Swiss Federal Government, in its Europe 2006 Report on relations between Switzerland and the EU, concluded that EU members had, and will continue to have, an unequivocal right to withdraw.
Finally, the draft EU Constitution, signed by the heads of government of all 27 current member-states of the EU on 29th October 2004, but not in force, provides that any member-state may withdraw:
The EU and its neighbours
These provisions would apply to the EU's relations with the UK in the event that the latter withdrew from the EU altogether, placing the UK on a legal footing vis-a-vis the EU no-less-favourable than that of Switzerland or Norway.